<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who says paper is dead? business model innovation in the newspaper industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/</link>
	<description>A fresh approach to strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janell Argie</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Janell Argie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent article. It had clear my doubt, i m using it from past 2 months but getting the good result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent article. It had clear my doubt, i m using it from past 2 months but getting the good result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bula Conlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Bula Conlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Love the post! I was searching for free classified advertising and classified related articles when I came across your website post on Bing. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the share. I&#039;ve saved this post for future reference :-) Nice post - Best Wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the post! I was searching for free classified advertising and classified related articles when I came across your website post on Bing. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the share. I&#8217;ve saved this post for future reference <img src='http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Nice post &#8211; Best Wishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criminal records</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>criminal records</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-695</guid>
		<description>This is fascinating, please post more often about Who says paper is dead? business model innovation in the newspaper industry &#124; Business Model Innovation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fascinating, please post more often about Who says paper is dead? business model innovation in the newspaper industry | Business Model Innovation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willard Lindman</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Willard Lindman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-560</guid>
		<description>Great post, I&#039;m a huge fan of this blog, keep up the great work, and I&#039;ll be a regular visitor for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I&#8217;m a huge fan of this blog, keep up the great work, and I&#8217;ll be a regular visitor for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Changing newspaper econonimcs and the demand for new business models &#124; Business Model Innovation</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Changing newspaper econonimcs and the demand for new business models &#124; Business Model Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] articles goes well along my analysis of the newspaper market, where I argue that just a transfer of the paper business model to the Internet does not work since [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] articles goes well along my analysis of the newspaper market, where I argue that just a transfer of the paper business model to the Internet does not work since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Stähler</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Stähler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-165</guid>
		<description>@Vivek Sorry, I know too little about the huffingtonpost to make a valid statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vivek Sorry, I know too little about the huffingtonpost to make a valid statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Thanks Patrick, did check Hamel and yes it does make seem to work. 

I also came across the Huffington Post - it offers few news and aggregates opinions. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

Your take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Patrick, did check Hamel and yes it does make seem to work. </p>
<p>I also came across the Huffington Post &#8211; it offers few news and aggregates opinions. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/</a></p>
<p>Your take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Stähler</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Stähler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-159</guid>
		<description>@Vivek Thanks for the link. We have to distinguish also the content the publishers want to get paid for. Pure news is worth little if you are not the first disseminating it since it will be a commodity the second it is out. Comments, insights, analyses might get paid, but you have to add richness to the original news. But even there it will be difficult to get paid for. I believe that we will see hybrid models. The content will be free, but if you want to see the speaker in person (limited capacity) people will pay for. You can see this very well with Gary Hamel. His blog is free but to get him as a speaker is definitely not. And here is another interesting phenomena. The author becomes more important in the niche-topics, the brand of the source is less important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vivek Thanks for the link. We have to distinguish also the content the publishers want to get paid for. Pure news is worth little if you are not the first disseminating it since it will be a commodity the second it is out. Comments, insights, analyses might get paid, but you have to add richness to the original news. But even there it will be difficult to get paid for. I believe that we will see hybrid models. The content will be free, but if you want to see the speaker in person (limited capacity) people will pay for. You can see this very well with Gary Hamel. His blog is free but to get him as a speaker is definitely not. And here is another interesting phenomena. The author becomes more important in the niche-topics, the brand of the source is less important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick,

Thanks for the quick reply! Like Jarvis writes journalism is a process in the future not a fixed product - profound. 

Maybe publishers are better off charging for select content instead of any thing and every thing they churn out. After all, why would anyone pay for news when there is Google out there? If this were to happen, dailies in essence would emulate magazine - not published daily but offering a back story and analysis.

At a broader level, the link below has an interesting read on whether people will pay for content.
http://whatmatters.mckinseydigital.com/the_debate_zone/will-people-pay-for-content-online

Vivek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick,</p>
<p>Thanks for the quick reply! Like Jarvis writes journalism is a process in the future not a fixed product &#8211; profound. </p>
<p>Maybe publishers are better off charging for select content instead of any thing and every thing they churn out. After all, why would anyone pay for news when there is Google out there? If this were to happen, dailies in essence would emulate magazine &#8211; not published daily but offering a back story and analysis.</p>
<p>At a broader level, the link below has an interesting read on whether people will pay for content.<br />
<a href="http://whatmatters.mckinseydigital.com/the_debate_zone/will-people-pay-for-content-online" rel="nofollow">http://whatmatters.mckinseydigital.com/the_debate_zone/will-people-pay-for-content-online</a></p>
<p>Vivek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Stähler</title>
		<link>http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/09/who-says-paper-is-dead-business-model-innovation-in-the-newspaper-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Stähler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/?p=419#comment-157</guid>
		<description>@Vivek Your distinction in magazine publishers and dailies is interesting. That distinction makes sense in the past. I think dailies will become more like magazines. They will not be published everyday anymore so we will see &quot;dailies&quot; that are published only every second day or less. 
On the internet, the distinction into daily newspapers and magazines does not make sense anymore. There is no publishing date on the web. Like Jarvis writes journalism is a process in the future not a fixed product.Like this blog post. Your comment added value to the article. And we gain new insights by this discussion. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vivek Your distinction in magazine publishers and dailies is interesting. That distinction makes sense in the past. I think dailies will become more like magazines. They will not be published everyday anymore so we will see &#8220;dailies&#8221; that are published only every second day or less.<br />
On the internet, the distinction into daily newspapers and magazines does not make sense anymore. There is no publishing date on the web. Like Jarvis writes journalism is a process in the future not a fixed product.Like this blog post. Your comment added value to the article. And we gain new insights by this discussion. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
